Thursday, November 15, 2018
I often get asked if emotional intelligence can be measured or tested, and the answer is yes! There are many different types of assessments out there, but the one we use at Penumbra is called the EQi 2.0. I came across this great article by Rich Bellis at Fast Company, and thought is a fun narrative about taking the assessment and interpreting the results. If you would like to take the "creepy test" and receive a 1-hour personal coaching call, click here.
Thursday, November 8, 2018
My guest interview this month is with Jerry Cox, he is the President of Brainier and we met in September at their annual user conference. I was so impressed with his presence throughout the event and the growth of the company under his leadership, I thought he would be a great person to interview. He has some keen insights on connecting with users on a human level in a high tech environment, not an easy task. Welcome, Jerry!
JS: What kind of advice would you offer to other executives for maintaining resiliency in an industry that is constantly changing at a rapid pace?
JC: A key component of resiliency is staying in touch with the person/group you are advocating for in the market. Having an open line of dialog to understand what challenges they face is crucial to developing solutions. It is so easy for companies to become complacent with success. A byproduct of that complacency being the focus stays on improvements to current products and services which solve yesterday’s problems and neglect the R&D to tackle the challenges of tomorrow. This habit of constantly listening to clients and prospects and, in turn, developing solutions for their changing needs, mixed with an adequate amount of humility will keep an organization responsive and leading the pack. A group lacking this quality is merely making bold and potentially expensive guesses.
JS: In today's world, where do EQ skills (recognize, read, respond) rank in an ideal leadership competency?
JC: This ties in directly with every organization’s struggle for resiliency in the sense that utilizing these basic EQ qualities has the potential to keep the focus on the drivers of change in a business opportunity. The most desirable companies to work for often repeat the often-quoted Steve Jobs line about listening to employees: "It doesn't make sense to hire smart people and then tell them what to do; we hire smart people so they can tell us what to do." Brilliant as that is, that responsiveness and openness is only one side of the equation. I do not believe that a leader can be successful over time if they have not mastered the ability to read themselves and others and respond appropriately to a wide variety of issues and situations.
JS: What role does human connection play in user engagement?
JC: The core of user engagement is “empathy.” A good developer will build a bulletproof platform or system for a user to navigate where they need to go. A great developer will map out the path through that platform using cues to lead the user to success. The difference is empathy. The most successful organizations in nearly every industry approach a new task with the focus on how the technology will empower a user to solve a problem as opposed to building a theoretically superior system.
Part of the customer support training we do internally at Brainier is founded on this empathetic approach. When a user requires a human connection to solve their issue, the least we could do is listen and be prepared as best we can.
This is our simple, yet effective Customer Care Checklist for every incoming call:
1. Make sure the caller takes away more USEFUL information than they brought.
2. Establish a path forward that includes Brainier.
3. Make sure the caller is satisfied with the answer.
It sounds very simple if we consider how many times that actually happens to us personally as consumers, it’s not often. I think EQ has a direct and profound impact on user engagement and the entire customer experience.
JS: How does that translate in a technology-based industry?
JC: In a technology-based industry, using an empathetic approach is critical because the stakes are higher. Users are very impatient and have higher expectations all the time. At Brainier, the products we are compared to are generally updated monthly, if not sooner. We find that users have almost zero tolerance for products that look potentially out-of-touch to them. This continual dialog is what maintains our relevance with our clients and in the industry.
Jerry Cox, President - Brainier Solutions
Mr. Cox has more than 30 years of general management experience, having worked in several industries including distribution, software, and manufacturing.
Since 2001, he has been the president of Brainier Solutions, a Minneapolis-based company, which provides technology-based Training and Development products to Corporations World-Wide. Mr. Cox has also held positions in technical sales, sales leadership and executive level leadership throughout his career.
He holds a BBA degree from Cleveland State University and has additional studies in electrical engineering and computer technology. In his spare time, he is an accomplished musician, an avid reader, and offers volunteer leadership on several boards and associations.
Thursday, November 1, 2018
I am not sure how it is November 1st already, but here we are. October is always a fun month at Penumbra Group because almost the whole team has an October birthday so each year we do something together as a group to celebrate. This year we went to the great city of Austin. We stayed downtown at a cool hotel/residential rental called “The Guild," where we each had our own complete apartment with full kitchen and washer and dryer. We took the opportunity to be together to get some fresh headshots taken by Valerie Fremin and Sid Ceasar. They did a great job, check out Valerie's site here. And our original plan included a downtown Segway tour (something none of us has ever done), but the unusually cold and rainy weather thwarted our plans.
So, at the last minute, we booked an Escape Room. We found out that if you are looking for a special team to uncover the date, time and place of the next terror attack, we are NOT the ones to hire! It was our first time attempting an Escape Room and it was much harder than I thought it was going to be. We were given hints along the way, but much of it comprised of our observation skills as we searched for clues. It was sometimes hard to distinguish between what was an actual clue vs a prop and once we knew something had meaning, trying to determine how to make use of it. It was a fun teambuilding experience and I would recommend it to anyone in the area! Ask for Robert, he was incredible!
Wishing you a great Thanksgiving holiday ahead and hope to see you at one of our upcoming events in Philadelphia, Boston, New York City, Salt Lake City or the Cayman Islands!
Thursday, October 25, 2018
It’s time to refocus back on interviewing, the stakes are high as hiring managers are confronted with the challenge of interviewing candidates that are savvier than ever. Applicants have educated themselves on the insider tips for winning the interviewing game. With the increasing difficulty in obtaining reference information and candidates who are well-rehearsed, interviewers are baffled at how to separate the style from the substance. This week we explore ways to uncover a critical skill needed for job success: coachability.
Maybe it’s the world we live in today or maybe it’s a generational thing, but employees seem to be very sensitive to feedback and are easily offended. For any of us to grow and thrive at work, we have to be willing to hear feedback and not only accept it but also make a behavioral change in order to improve. We call this coachability. How does someone interview a candidate and know they are coachable?
It’s important to know that coachability is learned. It is the result of several skills used in combination: self-awareness, flexibility, and optimism. You can ask questions to validate each and all of these skills in the context of being coachable.
We recommend using the behavior-based interview format and asking for a complete answer (circumstance, action, and result). For more information on this, check out our companion webinar which includes top interview questions broken-down by skill. And, a handy template for an interviewing 3x2 grid.
1." Describe a time when you were unfairly criticized and tell me what the details were."
This question is designed to uncover two things: the candidate's Self-Awareness and their definition of criticism. Be sure to get a specific example from them. The word "unfairly" is important to include as you will be assessing how justified the feedback they received was against their actions. Would a reasonable person think it was fair or unfair criticism? You also want to understand how sensitive they are to receiving negative performance feedback. In your opinion, does the example they share represent criticism or feedback? Do they take action to change their behavior as a result? Being coachable doesn’t mean we only change when we agree with the feedback, but also when we don’t.
2.“Tell me about a stretch assignment you were delegated that really challenged you.”
First off, you will find out if they have had any recent stretch assignments and their definition of “stretch” and “challenge”. I also like to follow up with questions about how the assignment came about – did they ask for it or was it required? I like to get a lot of details from them so I can also assess how they managed the stress of it and what they learned from the new experience. Coachable people are proactively willing to get out of their comfort zone and try something different.
3. “We’ve all had occasions when things at work don’t go our way. Think of a time when it happened to you and what the circumstances were. Give me a specific example.”
A pessimist will say they have several examples of this situation they can share. An optimist believes that setbacks or failures are isolated and do not allow them to permanently damage their sense of hope. Optimists believe that positive change is possible in themselves and others, so even when you ask for details of a challenge you will likely hear that they learned something good from it and use that information for the future. Coachable people take all experiences and use them to improve.
Technical skills and experience are always easier to ask about and assess in a candidate. Although the emotional intelligence skills may seem more difficult to measure, by using a systematic approach and asking the right questions you will get much higher quality information. Coachability is a key functional skill for every role and often determines retention, employee engagement, and job satisfaction.
Thursday, October 18, 2018
It can be easy to underestimate how much our behavior impacts the people around us. Sometimes, it can play out in the case of the "submarine boss," a leader who is silent for a period of time, then suddenly surfaces and makes requests that create chaos and knock every other boat out of the water. Other times it's a case of having an "initiative du jour," when a leader directs the group to take on one pet project one day and then switches the group to another project the following day. It's important to be aware of the downstream impact we have on our teams and how much disruption we may unknowingly cause.
Being Blind to Your Downstream Impact
As a leader in any organization, it's easy to have a blind spot regarding your downstream impact: you may not have any advisors to give you feedback, and your direct reports may silently defer to you. Chances are that they will never let on, at least directly, to the disruptive effects of your decisions, initiatives, requests, and behavior. For the manager who regularly communicates the belief that "my priorities override everyone else's" problems may occur. Employees can start to feel disrespected and become disgruntled. The leader may become the butt of a few jokes around the office or, worse, set him or herself up to be undermined by others as they disengage and fail to alert the leader to possible trouble or even set the leader up for failure. No one wants to work for a dictator, even a benevolent one.
Every decision you make as a leader ripples through your organization in waves, and the amplitude can become more intense the farther "downstream" it flows. Too many managers forget that the choices they make, even seemingly small ones, can have far-reaching effects throughout the organization. Notoriously shifting priorities, feeling hot about a project one day and cold the next, making everything a priority at once so that nothing is prioritized-all of these behaviors, and others, can get in the way of sustaining the organization's long-term goals and cloud the company's vision. By clearly reading the potential effect your behaviors have on others-by exercising empathy-you can avoid the pitfalls of being blind to your downstream impact.
- shift priorities on a whim or treat everything on their mind as a top priority
- assign "simple" tasks that are actually time and resource-intensive
- level jump, i.e., give assignments or directives to those further down the chain of command rather than to direct reports
- assigning things without deadlines and then reacting with urgency or disappointment when they are not done on your timeline
Ego says, "I have needs and my team will meet them." Ego says, "When I have an idea, I should have others implement it." Ego thinks about itself and doesn't notice the impact of its actions on everyone else. Ego doesn't pause either to reflect on how others might perceive its behaviors.
In contrast, EQ says, "My team has needs too and I will consider them when making my own known." EQ also signals the leader to consider the impact of making impulsive or last-minute requests on others in the group, recognizing that people have their own responsibilities to juggle. EQ reminds the leader too that treating employees with respect breeds return respect for the leader as opposed to trampling on others, which can lead to weakened support and loyalty.
If ego has the leader thinking in terms of "the team is here to serve me," then EQ has the leader thinking the converse: "I am here to serve the team." In practice, it is a blend of both of these approaches that helps to get things done in an organization, but the other-directed, EQ-related mindset can ensure that the leader never steps too far in the wrong direction.
The goal is to get good at recognizing when your ego is leading the way, causing you to instinctively make requests or engage in behaviors that have not been fully thought through in terms of possible downstream impact. If you have the urge to pitch a new strategy to your team, act on the latest business book, or hand out bonuses just because it feels right, notice this instinctive feeling and, instead of acting on it, pause and reflect on whether it is truly the right course of action-first, for yourself, and then for your team and organization.
Next, it's time to read the environment and exercise some empathy. How will your request or the big idea that you're thinking about acting on really affect your employees? Will it move the organization forward or disrupt workflow? Where would you rank your request or idea in terms of other organizational priorities? Is your ego leading the way or are you truly onto something important?
When you are ready to respond, keep your self-control at the ready. If after looking within and outside of you, you still feel justified to introduce your new idea, make requests, or engage in the desired behavior, do so with sensitivity to everyone else. This may mean calling a meeting with your executive team to get their input and perspectives before rolling out a new idea. Or it may mean your requests acknowledge the required time outlay and give others enough time to shift around priorities. Or maybe you simply ask, "How does that work for you?"
When you use EQ rather than allowing your ego to reflexively lead the way, you may abandon some ideas and initiatives; others will be rolled out with pacing and consideration. That's good news for everyone as you maximize workflow and your best ideas get implemented in a way that works for the whole team.
Thursday, October 11, 2018
I frequently get asked what I think is the best way to teach new skills on the job. My answer is often delegation. There is a difference between delegating tasks with the intent of completion versus delegating tasks with the intent of learning and completion. Want to increase employee accountability and minimize the risk of failure? Check out these quick tips to make the most of your assignments.
Development Activities vs. Job Duties
Small actions you take can provide you with a double benefit when delegating that maximize opportunities for employee learning while they work toward accomplishing job duties.
Important things to consider:
Thursday, October 4, 2018
All photos from the Brainier User Conference.
Why did we crop the photo of the three of us? Because, we
think it's pretty incredible just the way it is(we asked a
passerby to snap a quick picture)
Wow, we made it to the 4th quarter. In September we had the opportunity to all get together to attend the Brainier User Conference in Minneapolis, it was a great event! With technology changing constantly it is always good to catch up on the latest trends and solutions in the learning management system world. The good news is that emotional intelligence skills are as in demand as ever and employees who demonstrate flexibility, self-control, stress tolerance and empathy are highly sought after and valued in the workplace in every industry. My keynote is being converted into an eLearning module that will be available on their platform so you can catch it if you happen to be a current customer of theirs.
At the conference, I had the pleasure of meeting their CEO, Jerry Cox. He gave the welcome message and then stayed at the event, sitting in the ballroom at a table with clients and employees. I was impressed. Too often the key executive will make some opening remarks and leave immediately after they are done to tend to more pressing issues. Not Jerry. Then, a few days later I got a handwritten note from him in the mail. That’s right, handwritten. Who does that? What a rarity in today’s world that a busy executive will take the time to write a personal thank you note. The impact was huge. It was a good reminder to me to send more handwritten notes, it’s a small thing that has big meaning.